Read the excerpt from david foster wallace’s infinite jest. i have committed to crossing my legs i hope carefully, ankle on knee, hands together in the lap of my slacks. my fingers are mated into a mirrored series of what manifests, to me, as the letter x. the interview room’s other personnel include: the university’s director of composition, its varsity tennis coach, and academy prorector mr. a. delint. c. t. is beside me; the others sit, stand and stand, respectively, at the periphery of my focus. the tennis coach jingles pocket-change. which of the following best describes the point of view in this excerpt? a)this excerpt uses first-person—the reader is led through the story by a character who is in the story and uses the pronouns “i” or “me.” b)this excerpt uses third-person limited—the narrator is outside the story and only reveals the thoughts and feelings of one character. c)this excerpt uses third-person—the reader is led through the story by a narrator who is outside the story, describing the action and characters. d)this excerpt uses objective point of view—the narrator is outside the story and describes what is seen and heard about the other characters the answer is a.

Option correct is A: This excerpt uses first-person—the reader is led through the story by a character who is in the story and uses the pronouns “I” or “me.”

In narrative texts, the voice that tells the story is very important because it works as the point of view from which we observe the story. The narrator limits the content, it is through his eyes that we observe the situations and circumstances.

There are different narrators, but two of them are the most frequent:

The narrator in the first person

The narrator in the third person.

The first person can be the protagonist or not of the narrated event, but it is always part of the communicative situation. It is also common for a first-person narrator to remember a story and tell it to the reader.

The third-person narrator can know all aspects of the story. In this case, we call him an omniscient narrator. Otherwise, you can focus the perspective of it on a character.

ich statement best shows a problem in travels with charley?

one sharp difficulty presented itself. in the intervening twenty-five years my name had become reasonably well known.

this being so, my trip demanded that i leave my name and my identity at home.

i had to go alone and i had to be self-contained, a kind of casual turtle carrying his house on his back.

with all this in mind i wrote to the head office of a great corporation which manufactures trucks.

emerson essentially believes that traveling is overrated. he supports this perspective through an initial focus on "the idea" of places like italy, england, and egypt, and the fascination of "educated americans" with them. he argues that those places only took on the grand, majestic ideas that they represent because "they who made england, italy, or greece venerable in the imagination did so by sticking fast where they were, like an axis of the earth." yes, those places are grand, but only because they so clearly represent the places that they are. the art and culture of italy, england, and egypt is authentic, and therefore significant.

plz mark brainliest