Which statement best describes the resolution of "sleeping beauty”? aurora turns 16. the prince rescues aurora. aurora wakes up. maleficent casts a spell.

The statement that best describes the resolution of "Sleeping Beauty" is "Aurora wakes up."

The resolution is the part of a plot where the story ends, and where all problems presented during the plot are resolved.

Other parts of the plot are called:

Regarding "Sleeping Beauty," we can say that this is the tale where a girl named Aurora is cursed by a witch to sleep for a thousand years and only be awakened by the kiss of true love.

At the end of the story, a prince kisses Aurora, causing her to wake up, ending the tale.

For this reason, we can say that among the options presented, the option that shows that Aurora was awakened is the one that best represents the resolution of the plot.

More information on the link:

link

link

link

The Queen throws herself into the pit of reptiles.

Explanation:

The options provided in the question are not valid for the main answer. The missing and final resolution of the story of "Sleeping Beauty" is that the queen/ogress was so enraged with what had happened. Then she flung herself into the pit that had been filled with the horrid reptiles she herself had requested to be done.

The last statements or passage in the story reads-

"No one dared tell him, when the ogress, enraged at what she saw, flung herself head foremost into the copper, where she was instantly devoured by the horrid reptiles, with which she had herself caused it to be filled."

All the options provided in the question are not part of the final resolution of "Sleeping Beauty", thus the final correct answer will/should be

The Queen throws herself into the pit of reptiles.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.