O'brien can you give us your opinion of mr. harmon's work? sawicki i think he's an outstanding young man. he is talented, bright, and compassionate. he's very much involved with depicting his neighborhood and environment in a positive manner. o'brien do you consider him an honest young man? sawicki absolutely. . o'brien nothing further. . petrocelli you said you're a teacher in mr. harmon's school. do you live in his neighborhood? sawicki no, i don't. petrocelli so although you want to vouch for his character, isn't it fair to say that you don't know what he does when he goes to his neighborhood and you go home to yours? sawicki no, it's not. his film footage shows me what he's seeing and, to a large extent, what he's thinking. and what he sees, the humanity of it, speaks of a very deep character. petrocelli what was he doing on the afternoon of december 22nd? did he show you a film of that day? sawicki no, he did not. petrocelli do you feel that the ability to make a film means that someone is honest? sawicki it is my belief that to make an honest film, one has to be an honest person. i would say that. and i do believe in steve's honesty. do you believe mr. sawicki’s characterization of steve? give evidence from the passage to support your answer.

Which line from president reagan’s address sat moscow state university is a fact? a. democracy is the standard by which governments are measured. b. throughout the world, free markets are the model for growth. c. the key is freedom-freedom of thought, freedom of information, freedom of communication. d. every four years the american people choose a new president, and 1988 is one of those years.

What does hofmann use of the pronoun it imply about the sister feeling about gregor

Me for the love of god. i've been working on this assignment for 3 days and i don't understand the speeches at all ive read both 4 times over and i don't understand either of them if your right i will give you brainlest (i think that's how you spell it) and 99 pts. for this assignment, you will write an evaluation of either of two historic passages. • patrick henry’s “give me liberty, or give me death! ” speech (1775) • frederick douglass’s address, “what to the slave is the fourth of july? ” (1852) 1. what is the speaker’s viewpoint? what is his claim? type your answer here. (score for question 2: of 2 points) 2. what reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim? type your answer here. (score for question 3: of 4 points) 3. how valid are the speaker’s reasons for his claim? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 4: of 2 points) 4. what evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons? type your answer here. (score for question 5: of 4 points) 5. is the speaker’s evidence relevant and sufficient? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 6: of 4 points) 6. does the speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? use evidence from the text to support your answers. type your answer here. (score for question 7: of 4 points) 7. what counterclaims or alternate claims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them? type your answer here. (score for question 8: of 4 points) 8. how effective is the speaker’s response to counterclaims or alternate claims? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 9: of 4 points) 9. write a one-paragraph evaluation of the speaker’s argument. type your answer here.