I'm timed can someone plz fast read the excerpt from immigrant kids, by russell freedman. those who failed to get past both doctors had to undergo a more thorough medical exam. the others moved on to the registration clerk, who questioned them with the aid of an interpreter: what is your name? your nationality? your occupation? can you read and write? have you ever been in prison? how much money do you have with you? where are you going? which answer choice best paraphrases this excerpt? interpreters were used to give medical examinations to immigrants. they would ask them questions about where they were from and where they were planning to go in america. if someone failed the medical exam, they would be sent to another doctor. after passing a medical exam, immigrants would be asked their name and questioned by a clerk in their native language. topics included nationality, what kind of work they could do, and literacy. each person was also asked if they had been to prison, how much money they had brought, and their destination in the united states. immigrants passing the medical test were at once given a more thorough examination by a third doctor. if they failed this exam, they were sent back to their own country. if they passed, they were asked a series of questions before being allowed to enter the united states. while it was unfair, this was the system in place at the time. with the of an interpreter, immigrants were asked the following questions before being let into the united states: what is your name? your nationality? your occupation? can you read and write? have you ever been in prison? how much money do you have with you? where are you going?

Which of these events inspired many of stephen crane’s writings, including the story “an episode of war”?

What is the meaning of the word "caches" as it is used in paragraph 6

Read the passage. excerpt from "why equal pay is worth fighting for" by senator elizabeth warren, april 17, 2014 i honestly can't believe that we're still arguing over equal pay in 2014. when i started teaching elementary school after college, the public school district didn't hide the fact that it had two pay scales: one for men and one for women. women have made incredible strides since then. but 40 years later, we're still debating equal pay for equal work. women today still earn only 77 cents for every dollar a man earns, and they're taking a hit in nearly every occupation. bloomberg analyzed census data and found that median earnings for women were lower than those for men in 264 of 265 major occupation categories. in 99.6 percent of occupations, men get paid more than women. that's not an accident; that's discrimination. the effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans. pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women. . for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by, and many families depend as much on mom's salary as they do on dad's, if not more. women are the main breadwinners, or joint breadwinners, in two-thirds of the families across the country, and pay discrimination makes it that much harder for these families to stay afloat. women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination, but it's not easy. today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes. here in the senate, sen. barbara mikulski (d-md.) introduced the paycheck fairness act to give women the tools to combat wage discrimination. it would ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women. senator warren states that the effects of pay discrimination are long-lasting. is this a valid argument supported by accurate evidence? no; warren weakens her point by claiming that the paycheck fairness act would "give women the tools to combat wage discrimination." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "for middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by." yes; warren supports her point by noting, "pay inequality also means a tougher retirement for women." no; warren weakens her point by noting, "today, a woman can get fired for asking the guy across the hall how much money he makes."