Someone me ! im going to really appreciate it which details are evidence that supports the author's claim? check all that apply. author's claim: the success of the information age depends on the ability to protect information as it flows around the world, and this relies on the power of cryptography. a) "we are now entering the information age." b) "today [encryption] also has a role to play in facilitating business." c) "we have access to extraordinary strong encryption." d) "government could inherit a technology infrastructure that's optimized for surveillance." e) "the e-mail could have been written by a criminal attempting to divert the money."

The answer is option B and D.

Explanation:

Cryptography is the study and practice of securing communication to prevent third parties to access private messages or information. This is especially relevant on the internet and the Information Age that has came with it.

According to the author's claim, the power of cryptography and the ability to protect information with it nowadays, would guarantee the success of the Information Age. The main details that support this claim are B and D.

First, we have the role encryption has to play in such areas like business, as said in option B, and how it could facilitate the whole process, which demands more strict security protocols regarding the information flow in between. Then there are the resources available to improve said protocols and reinforce the security as well, which is possible if the government develop a decent technology infrastructure that can be optimized for surveillance, as said in option D. This can also lead to a better experience to keep improving the infrastructure for safe encryption.

Both details support the main point of the claim: how cryptography is closely related to the success or failure of the Age of Information as it is known by how the information flows and how can this affect the privacy and security of third-parties in a good or bad way.

    i got this from a website called shmoop. i will give you a link and i will show you half of it. hope it : )

explanation:

mrs. mallard has a heart condition, which means that if she's startled she could die. so, when news comes that her husband's been killed in an accident, the people who tell her have to cushion the blow.

mrs. mallard's sister josephine sits down with her and dances around the truth until mrs. mallard finally understands what happened. the deceased mr. mallard's friend, richards, hangs out with them for moral support.

richards originally found out because he had been in the newspaper headquarters when a report of the accident that killed mr. mallard, which happened on a train, came through. richards waited for proof from a second source before going to the mallards' to share the news.

when mrs. mallard finds out what happened she acts differently from most women in the same position, who might disbelieve it. she cries passionately before deciding to go to her room to be by herself.

in her room, mrs. mallard sits down on a comfy chair and feels completely depleted. she looks out the window and looks out at a world that seems alive and fresh. she can see the sky coming between the rain clouds.

mrs. mallard sits still, occasionally crying briefly like a kid might.

the narrator describes her as youthful and pretty, but because of this news she looks preoccupied and absent.

she seems to be holding out for some kind of unknown news or knowledge, which she can tell is approaching.

mrs. mallard breathes heavily and tries to resist before succumbing to this unknown thing, which is a feeling of freedom.

acknowledging freedom makes her revive, and she doesn't consider whether she should feel bad about it.

mrs. mallard thinks to herself about how she'll cry when she sees her husband's dead body and how much he loved her. even so, she's kind of excited about the chance to make her own decisions and not feel accountable to anyone.

mrs. mallard feels even more swept up by the idea of freedom than the fact that she had felt love for her husband.

here is the link:

in 1636, roger williams settled at the tip of narragansett bay after being banished from the massachusetts bay colony for his religious views, on land granted to him by the narragansett tribe. he called the site "providence plantation" and declared it a place of religious freedom.

explanation: