Consider the following description of two algorithms, A and B, each with the same Big-O. In A's actual growth function there is a larger constant being added than in B's. In B's actual growth function the dominant factor has a larger constant multiplier than in A's. Assume that the functions are alike in every other way. When looking at actual run-times (rather than Big-Oh), is one likely to be better than the other in all circumstances? If so, which? Explain. A. Neither is better than the other in any circumstance, because the two algorithms have the same Big-Oh and will always have exactly the same performance.
B. B is the better algorithm because the larger constant addend in A means that A will always have more overhead than B.
C. A is the better algorithm because the larger constant multiplier in B means that A will always be more efficient than B.
D. None of these is correct.

answeruse the nslookup utility;

we can all learn from our past mistakes because we all have different ways of learning different types of techniques. my way may or may not another classmate remember and have the repetition to acknowledge such standard. such as remembering acronyms. using abbreviations to us remember keep things in order in our memory. this us figure out what comes next in the sequence. if so, what we have is a sentence of just letters all in caps. we either know the meaning or have no idea what it stands for. most of the time we know the meaning and context. but most of us who don't know, should learn by having a quick glance at what needs to be remembered. such as repetition in the memory for acronyms. one way that me, is the fact that i'm always doing math and english assignments. so we have to remember specific meanings such as soapstone for documents, such as citing correctly. or pemdas for doing the equations correctly, even if it's the super long way. this works for everyone. you just have to find what works for you by practicing and repetition daily.