Jane has an intent to penetrate the network in an organization. She has used passive reconnaissance to gather extensive information on the company. She finds out the model numbers of routers and other devices by reading discussions between system administrators in forums. She also has a list of all the IT staff and their phone numbers. She also has the services running on ports on some machines she ran a network scanner on. What reasonable steps should the company have taken to prevent Jane from finding this information?
What steps should the company take to prevent or reduce the efficacy of port scans?

Read the following scenario, and then answer the question below. you want to send an e-mail to your boss requesting a meeting to discuss a raise. what is the best example of an e-mail to an employer about this meeting? “hey jason. can we chat about getting me more money soon? let me know. peace, meg.” “hello jason. pardon me for sending yet another e-mail today about my need to talk to you about my position and a possible pay increase. i am dying to know when you can talk. sincerely, meg.” “hello jason. i have been with the company for one year and have taken on more responsibilities than outlined in my job description. i would appreciate an opportunity to speak with you about my position. let me know when we can schedule a meeting. you, meg.” “greetings jason! i hope this e-mail finds you well and happy today. i really, really want to talk to you about something important. i am not sure if you have time. i hope you do. get back in touch with me and let me know when we might talk. ever so much for taking the time to read this. sincerely, meg.”

The idea that, for each pair of devices v and w, there’s a strict dichotomy between being “in range” or “out of range” is a simplified abstraction. more accurately, there’s a power decay function f (·) that specifies, for a pair of devices at distance δ, the signal strength f(δ) that they’ll be able to achieve on their wireless connection. (we’ll assume that f (δ) decreases with increasing δ.) we might want to build this into our notion of back-up sets as follows: among the k devices in the back-up set of v, there should be at least one that can be reached with very high signal strength, at least one other that can be reached with moderately high signal strength, and so forth. more concretely, we have values p1 ≥ p2 ≥ . . ≥ pk, so that if the back-up set for v consists of devices at distances d1≤d2≤≤dk, thenweshouldhavef(dj)≥pj foreachj. give an algorithm that determines whether it is possible to choose a back-up set for each device subject to this more detailed condition, still requiring that no device should appear in the back-up set of more than b other devices. again, the algorithm should output the back-up sets themselves, provided they can be found.\

Which style did jack use on the vocabulary words in reports?