1.) You want to answer, possibly, your hypothesis. 2.) If you have a prompt and a claim, write your hypothesis down in this form: If , then.

3.) Use the scientific process of performing an experiment, like observation, measurement, etc.

4.) LABEL all the sides of your (bar, line, etc) graph.

5.) Write a sentence using your graph in this form:

It (increased/decreased) because .

This value is the (greatest/least) because .

6.) Explain why or why not the hypothesis supported your observations and measurements.

My hypothesis (did/didn't) support my experiment because .

7.) In other words, how does your graph, observations, etc., go along with your hypothesis?

Hope this helps.

the correct answer is: a.)it is never appropriate to use acronyms and emoticons in business communication.

the benefits of raising bc’s minimum wage to $15 through a

series of pre-announced staged increases far outweigh the likely

costs. claims that such an increase will lead to massive job losses

in low-wage sectors of the economy are not credible.

• an increase to $15 would result in some job losses. however,

the likely impact is less than a 1 per cent reduction in the overall

provincial employment rate, and a 7.6 per cent reduction in the

employment rate for those currently making between $10.25

and $15 per hour.

• the large job loss impacts predicted by some opponents of

minimum wages misrepresent the existing economic research. in

reading and using that research, it is important to recognize that

estimates showing job loss effects of minimum wage increases

apply only to teenagers. estimated effects for young adult and

adult workers range from insignificant to non-existent.

• focusing on teenage workers plays up an inaccurate stereotype

about who earns very low wages in bc and leads to exaggerated

claims about job losses. only 26 per cent of those currently making

between $10.25 and $12 are teenagers, and only 5 per cent

of those making between $12 and $15 are teenagers.