subject

The sender side of rdt3.0 simply ignores (that is, takes no action on) all received packets that are either in error or have the wrong value in the acknum field of an acknowledged packet. Suppose that in such circumstances, rdt3.0 were simply to retransmit the current data packet. Would the protocol still work? (Hint: Consider what would happen if there were only bit errors; there are no packet losses but premature timeouts can occur. Consider how many times the nth packet is sent, in the limit as n approaches infinity).

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Computers and Technology

image
Computers and Technology, 22.06.2019 04:00, yolo1430
Acetylene is a gas which burns rapidly on its own, and is considered highly explosive. a) true b) false
Answers: 2
image
Computers and Technology, 22.06.2019 18:30, lizz1228
Kto rozmawia z clamentain przez krótkofalówke w the walking dead w 4 epizodzie
Answers: 1
image
Computers and Technology, 22.06.2019 22:30, juliangarcia0002
Which of the following factors would your hypothetical supervisor look at when deciding whether to test a biological material sample for dna? the amount of other evidence you have implicating a suspect in a crime the annual budget for the crime lab both of the above none of the above; you would almost always order a test
Answers: 3
image
Computers and Technology, 23.06.2019 06:00, Disd112984
Which statement is true of web-based social media? a. they allow consumers to interact with and update content. b. they cannot be updated easily, as compared to print media. c. they are expensive to produce and maintain, as compared to print and television. d. they can exist independent of the internet.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The sender side of rdt3.0 simply ignores (that is, takes no action on) all received packets that are...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 06.12.2019 22:31
Konu
History, 06.12.2019 22:31
Konu
Business, 06.12.2019 22:31