A store sells rope only in whole-foot increments. Given three lengths of rope, in feet, the following code segment is intended to display the minimum length of rope, in feet, that must be purchased so that the rope is long enough to be cut into the three lengths. For example, for lengths of 2.8 feet, 3 feet, and 5 feet, the minimum length of rope that must be purchased is 11 feet. For these inputs, the code segment should display 11. As another example, for lengths of 1.1 feet, 3.2 feet, and 2 feet, the minimum length of rope that must be purchased is 7 feet. For these inputs, the code segment should display 7.
double len1
double len2
double len3;
double total = len1 + len2 + len3
int minLength = (int) (total + 0.5)
System. out. print(minLength)
Which of the following best describes the behavior of the code segment?
A. The code segment works as intended for all non-negative values of len1, len2, and len3.
B. The code segment works as intended but only when the sum of the three lengths is an integer or the decimal part of the sum of the three lengths is greater than or equal to 0.5.
C. The code segment does not work as intended for some values of len1, len2, and len3. It could be corrected by casting len1, len2, and len3 to int before adding them together and assigning the sum to minLength.
D. The code segment does not work as intended for some values of len1, len2, and len3. It could be corrected by declaring minLength as a double and casting it to an int in the System. out. print statement.
E. The code segment does not work as intended for any values of len1, len2, and len3. It returns the sum of 0.5 and the three lengths for all values of len1, len2, and len3.

The answer is "option B".

Explanation:

In the given code, four double variable "len1, len2, len3, and total" is declared, in which the first three variables accept some value, and in the total variable, we add those variable. In the next step, an integer variable minLength is defined, which converts the decimal value to an integer and adds the value that is "0.5". In this section, the code uses as an intended purpose but only if the total of 3 lengths is equivalent to or larger then 0.5, and wrong choices can be described as follows:

(a) oldest

the benefits of raising bc’s minimum wage to $15 through a

series of pre-announced staged increases far outweigh the likely

costs. claims that such an increase will lead to massive job losses

in low-wage sectors of the economy are not credible.

• an increase to $15 would result in some job losses. however,

the likely impact is less than a 1 per cent reduction in the overall

provincial employment rate, and a 7.6 per cent reduction in the

employment rate for those currently making between $10.25

and $15 per hour.

• the large job loss impacts predicted by some opponents of

minimum wages misrepresent the existing economic research. in

reading and using that research, it is important to recognize that

estimates showing job loss effects of minimum wage increases

apply only to teenagers. estimated effects for young adult and

adult workers range from insignificant to non-existent.

• focusing on teenage workers plays up an inaccurate stereotype

about who earns very low wages in bc and leads to exaggerated

claims about job losses. only 26 per cent of those currently making

between $10.25 and $12 are teenagers, and only 5 per cent

of those making between $12 and $15 are teenagers.