Which statement explains whether or not a person should use an experiment of a ball rolling down a hill as evidence that the force of gravity pulls objects straight down? A. They should not use it. The experiment has several dimensions of motion, including one parallel to the ground, so the motion of the ball does not directly test the force of gravity. B, They should not use it. The experiment has several dimensions of motion, including one parallel to the ground, so the motion of the ball does not directly test the force of gravity. C. They should not use it. Gravity should be tested in space, and this experiment could only be tested on Earth. D. They should not use it. Gravity should be tested in space, and this experiment could only be tested on Earth. They should use it. The experiment shows the ball falls toward the bottom of the hill, so it provides direct evidence that gravity pulls an object downward. E. They should use it. The experiment shows the ball falls toward the bottom of the hill, so it provides direct evidence that gravity pulls an object downward. F. They should use it. Any experiment on Earth involving natural motion will provide direct evidence that gravity pulls objects straight down.
Answers: 3
Chemistry, 21.06.2019 23:30, tylerineedhelp
Ihat will happen if i added baking soda to vinegar
Answers: 2
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 10:00, alexabdercmur
Why is the structure of molecule important to its function?
Answers: 1
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 15:20, munziruddin204
Which description best characterizes the motion of particles in a solid?
Answers: 2
Which statement explains whether or not a person should use an experiment of a ball rolling down a h...
Social Studies, 05.07.2021 06:10
Engineering, 05.07.2021 06:10
English, 05.07.2021 06:10
English, 05.07.2021 06:10
Biology, 05.07.2021 06:30
Mathematics, 05.07.2021 06:30
Chemistry, 05.07.2021 06:30