Claim: An ecosystem can survive with only producers. Do you agree or disagree with this claim? Explain your answer. Be sure to include evidence and reasoning.

The path of food and energy from producer to consumer to decomposer is a food chain. ... However, although an ecosystem can exist without consumers, no ecosystem can survive without producers and decomposers. The simplest food chain is producer —>• decomposer.

Explanation:

No.

Explanation:

The reason for this is if everything in an ecosystem was a producer there would be nothing consuming and soon the ecosystem would be overwhelmed by two many products and nothing to consume them. A healthy ecosystem is a balanced cycle that makes sure everything is working properly and everything benefits something else. A food chain of sort is often seen in a balances ecosystem to show how everything is useful and needed. So in answer if there were only producers an ecosystem wouldn't thrive at its full potential, if at all.

I hope this helped! Brainliest if it did? No pressure!

Have a great day! :D

a. the law of proportion states the combination of 2 atoms in a specific ratio to produce multiple compounds such as the given statement of question ‘1st compound contains 88.8 % cu ’ indicates 88.8 g of cu is present along with 11.2 g oxygen in 100 g of compound whereas the statement ‘2st compound contains 79.9 % cu ’ indicates 79.9 g of cu is present along with 20.1 g oxygen in 100 g of compound

1st compound contains 88.8 g cu

for cu

m = 63 g /mol

atomic % = 88.8 /63 = 1.42

for o

m = 16 g /mol

atomic % = 11.2 /16 = 0.7

b. the emperical formula of 1st compound is

cu1.4o0.7

cu2o