Are nuclear bombs ethical? Explain please

Yes, they are.

Explanation:

The United States is one of these nuclear superpowers, making the ethical issues associated with these weapons critical and relevant. ... Most research across disciplines unanimously agrees that it is immoral to detonate an atomic weapon due to both short and long-term catastrophic effects.

In fact, some scholars have concluded that it is therefore morally wrong to act in ways that produce these outcomes, which means it is morally wrong to engage in nuclear warfare.

NO not at all.

Explanation:

After reading the accounts of people who survived the bomb in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 during World War II, I was horrified just reading the testimonies. Almost every single survivor described the skinless and bloated bodies they had seen everywhere. Inosuke Hayasaki, a surivor of the bombing, noticed one of his classmates, among many other citizens, pleading for water. When he tried listening for his heartbeat, his "skin slipped right off". Bombs are used in war so the other side will surrender. Bombs are aimed at "enemies" as if every being is an object to destroy. So no, bombinglet alone nuclear bombingis ethical.

as given the equation is

2al + 6 hcl > 2 alcl3 + 3 h2(g)

as per equation two moles of aluminum reacts with six moles of hcl to give two moles of alcl3 and three moles of hydrogen gas

given: three moles of al are present and 7 moles of hcl

for three moles of aluminum nine moles of hcl will be required

however as 7 moles of hcl are present so the limiting reagent is hcl

hcl is going to decide the number of moles of product formed

when six moles of hcl are present = 3 moles of h2 are formed

when one mole of hcl is present == 3/6 mole sof h2 will be formed

when 7 moles of hcl are present = 3 x 7/ 6 moles of h2 will be formed = 3.5 moles of h2

diaria maybe go see a doctor about that