The balanced chemical equation, 2no (g) + 5h2 (g) (arrow pointing this way > > ) 2nh3 (g) + 2h2o (g), can be expressed in words as:

nitrogen dioxide gas plus hydrogen gas yields ammonia gas plus water

nitrogen monoxide gas plus hydrogen gas yields ammonia gas plus water vapor

nickel monoxide gas plus hydrogen gas yields nitrogen trihydride plus water

nitrogen oxide gas plus hydrogen gas yields ammonia gas plus water vapor

i think it's either b, or d. i can't figure out which one it is though. .

B) Nitrogen monoxide gas plus hydrogen gas yields ammonia gas plus water vapor

Explanation:

The given reaction is:

Here the chemical names of the reactants are:

NO = nitric oxide or nitrogen monoxide in gas phase

H2 = hydrogen gas

NH3 = ammonia in gas phase

H2O = water in gas phase i.e. vapor

Therefore the reaction can be expressed in words as:

Nitrogen monoxide gas plus hydrogen gas yields ammonia gas plus water vapor

1. the question asks the most appropriate, which seems to rule out "all of the above." your choice appears to be the correct one.

2. the protocol described is good for identifying correlation, but not cause and effect. for cause/effect, you need to devise a protocol that will assign the treatment (or not) to groups that have essentially the same "demographics" with respect to all the other variables. your choice regarding control group seems appropriate. random assignment of treatment (choice d) may be appropriate also. (i think you can argue that b and d are just different descriptions of the same method.)

3. d will randomize the birds, but may not guarantee there are 10 in each group. e will do both, so seems the better choice.

comment on question 2

based on the problem statement, it seems clear that confident, attentive drivers are more likely to use daytime running lights. so, the protocol might need to be devised in such a way that the lights would be turned on or off without the driver's knowledge. (an attentive driver will figure it out.) assigning a confident, attentive driver to a group required to drive without running lights might mess with his/her confidence and attentiveness. you don't want your experiment to do that. (nor do you want the experiment to subject a driver to greater risk of accident as a consequence of driving without running lights.) experiments involving human safety are always problematic.

can you attach the