Which bond would require more energy to break apart? (Short bond or Long bond). Explain a) longer bond. because the charges are further apart
b) shorter bond. because the charges are closer together
c) shorter bond. because the charges are both positive
d) longer bond. because the charges are closer together

shorter bond, because charges are close apart

Explanation:

shorter the bond length more is the energy required to break the bond for example if you take three pencils of different sizes one longer One medium sized One Shot sized if you try to break them the longer pencil will break much faster than the other two because the greater the length the lesser the strength the lesser energy you need to apply to break them apart ...

hope you understand

cc jyfu65   6r 67r   r576dyfu r6tyuio fghjkl;

first let us lay out the formula for potential

and kinetic energy:

pe = mgh

ke = (mv^2)/2

where: m=mass, v=velocity, g=gravitational

acceleration, h=height

calculating for mass using the known values of

pe:

340j = m (9.81 m/s^2) (50ft) (1m/3.28ft)

m = 2.27 kg

the law of conservation of energy states that

energy is neither created nor destroyed. therefore, the change in kinetic

energy from 50 ft to 35 ft would be equal to the change in potential energy

from 50 ft to 35 ft. however it would be opposite in signs since one is losing

while other is gaining.

ke(35ft) – ke(50ft) = - [ pe(35ft) – pe(50ft]

ke(50ft) = 0 since the brick is initially at rest

ke(35ft) = 340j - 2.27kg (9.81 m/s^2) (35ft)

(1m/3.28 ft)

ke(35ft)

= 102.38 j