Observe: Select the Show polar molecule inset checkbox. The animation shows the probable location of electrons (orange dots) in a polar molecule. A. What do you notice about the distribution of the electrons? B. How does this electron distribution affect the charges of the bonded atoms?

A. In a polar molecule, the bond is polar covalent. That is, the electrons are shared but are slightly more attracted to the more electronegative atom. That part of the molecule has a negative partial charge density, and the other has a positive partial charge density (there is no symmetry in the distribution of the electricity density)

B. Charges are not affected, the molecule is neutral because electrons are shared. A molecule has the same number of electrons and protons which balance the charges in a molecule. Since all atoms are electrically neutral, then when they combine the form of a neutral molecule.

Explanation:

To determine polarity, the geometry of the molecule must be taken into account to determine the distribution of atoms and their electronegativity (tendency to attract electrons) to determine to which points of the molecule the electrons will be most attracted.

Atoms can share electrons to form chemical bonds and thus form different compounds. In the case of non-polar molecules, when formed in a covalent bond (two atoms bond by sharing valence electrons reaching "stable octet") between equal atoms, the molecule is neutral since it has zero electric charge. In this type of bond there is no change in the oxidation number of the atoms because their shared electrons are equidistant. Covalent bonds in which the electrons are shared equally are called non-polar covalent bonds. This is because the atoms are just the same, they have the same electronegativity, so they "attract" the electrons with the same force and the electrons surround the atoms equally. The charge density distribution is the same for both, there is asymmetry in the distribution of it.

Polar molecules are formed when bonds are formed by different atoms with large differences in electronegativity. The molecule is electrically neutral as a whole because it has an equal number of positive and negative particles, but there is no symmetry in the distribution of the electricity density. A polar bond is one in which a pair of electrons is more attracted to one of the atoms. This causes one end of the molecule to acquire a positive partial charge density and the other end of the molecule to acquire a positive partial charge density and the other end of the molecule to acquire a negative partial charge.

So, as a summary:

A. In a polar molecule, the bond is polar covalent. That is, the electrons are shared but are slightly more attracted to the more electronegative atom. That part of the molecule has a negative partial charge density, and the other has a positive partial charge density (there is no symmetry in the distribution of the electricity density)

B. Charges are not affected, the molecule is neutral because electrons are shared. A molecule has the same number of electrons and protons which balance the charges in a molecule. Since all atoms are electrically neutral, then when they combine the form of a neutral molecule. Only ions do not have a neutral electrical charge because of the process of gaining or losing electrons. An ion with a positive electrical charge is called a cation, and an ion with a negative electrical charge is called an anion.

answer is a

explanation:

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation: