Chemistry, 12.10.2020 01:01 sophiaa23

Two scientists write a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submit it to a scientific journal. Several months later, the publisher sends them back the paper. Many comments from several fellow scientists are attached.
Which step will the authors of the paper most likely take next?
They will change their research to a different topic and start all over again
O They will alter the data to match the results that their peers were expecting.
O They will incorporate the suggestions from their peers and resubmit the paper.
They will sue the journal for delaying their research and not printing the paper

Answers: 2

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Chemistry

Chemistry, 22.06.2019 03:50, daniel9299

Consider the reaction: n2(g) + o2(g) ? 2no(g) kc = 0.10 at 2000oc starting with initial concentrations of 0.040 mol/l of n2 and 0.040 mol/l of o2, calculate the equilibrium concentration of no in mol/l how would this be done?

Answers: 3

continue

Chemistry, 22.06.2019 09:20, pandaman632

What happened to the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere from 2010–2017?

Answers: 1

continue

Chemistry, 22.06.2019 15:20, merrickrittany

An alloy contains 66 g of pure zinc. what is the percentage of zinc in the alloy? express your answer to two significant figures and include the appropriate units.

Answers: 1

continue

Chemistry, 22.06.2019 20:30, sydneip6174

We are hoping to create 5.72 grams of glucose. the plant was given 4.75 liters of co2 and 2.81 g of h20. which reactant was the limiting reagent? how much excess mass did we have of the other reactant?

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

Two scientists write a paper detailing their research and conclusions and submit it to a scientific...