subject
Chemistry, 16.01.2020 18:31 gregorio03

Scientific paper is rejected during peer review of a journal because the
experiment was done only once which best explains why the reviewer
o
a the reviewer was biased against the other scientist.
o
b
the reviewer thought that the results might not be reliable.
o
the reviewer had a different opinion on how the experiment
should be done
o
r. the reviewer wanted to reproduce the experiment and take credit
for it.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Chemistry

image
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 10:30, scott5315
Consider the following reactions. (note: (s) = solid, (l) = liquid, and (g) = gas.) mg(s) + ½o2(g) → mgo(s) + 146 kcal/mole h2(g) + ½o2(g) → h2o(g), δh = -57.82 kcal/mole what type of reaction is represented by the previous two examples?
Answers: 3
image
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 14:00, coylenoah0
How many absorptions would you expect to observe in the 13c nmr spectra of the following molecules? a) 3-chloropentane b) cis-4-methyl-2-pentene
Answers: 2
image
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 20:00, morgaaaan3835
How many moles are in 123.0 grams of kclo4?
Answers: 1
image
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 23:10, bugbug89
What are the two major rules associated with polarity
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Scientific paper is rejected during peer review of a journal because the
experiment was done o...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 24.12.2019 17:31
Konu
Computers and Technology, 24.12.2019 17:31