Plz (the models were dalton, bohr, thomson, rutherford)

1. which models of the atom from task 1 are not supported by rutherford’s experimental evidence? for each of these models, explain the experimental results that the model would predict.

2. think about the results each model would predict for the experiment with hydrogen gas. which models of the atom does the experimental evidence support? explain why these models are compatible with the experimental results.

3. which models of the atom in task 1 are not supported by the results of the hydrogen gas experiment? for each of these models, explain the experimental results that the model would predict.

yes, water is wet, just as it makes other things wet, it is wet itself, kinda like ice, when ice is in water, the ice makes water cold, and ice is cold, therefore with that example, water is wet

the movement of aircraft through clouds can even cause lightning strikes. a single lightning event is a "flash", which is a complex, multi-stage explosively ejected.

explanation:

and the person below goggled it.

mark as brainliest

the old alchemists made significant contributions to science even though there starting premises were off a bit. their conclusions after failure would steer them into better directions for investigation. science is no more than close observation and the initial mistakes result in rethinking and retrying experiments.