Using the following equation for the combustion of octane, calculate the heat associated with the combustion of 100.0 g of octane assuming complete combustion. the molar mass of octane is 114.33 g/mole. the molar mass of oxygen is 31.9988 g/mole.
2 c8h18 + 25 o2 → 16 co2 + 18 h2o δh°rxn = -11018 kj
a) -535.4 kj
b) -4819 kj
c) -602.3 kj
d) -385.5 kj
e) -11018 kj

The heat associated with the combustion of 100.0 g of octane, assuming complete combustion, is B) -4819 kJ.

Let's consider the following thermochemical equation.

2 C₈H₁₈ + 25 O₂ → 16 CO₂ + 18 H₂O ΔH°rxn = -11018 kJ

First, we will convert 100.0 g of octane to moles using its molar mass (114.33 g/mol).

According to the thermochemical equation, 11018 kJ of heat are evolved when 2 moles of octane are combusted. The heat associated with the combustion of 0.8747 moles of octane is:

The heat associated with the combustion of 100.0 g of octane, assuming complete combustion, is B) -4819 kJ.

Learn more: link

B) -4819 kJ

Explanation:

The balanced reaction for combustion of octane is:

To calculate the number of moles, we use the equation:

given mass of octane = 100.0 g

Molar mass of octane = 114.33 g/mol

Putting in the values we get:

According to stoichiometry:

2 moles of octane give heat = -11018 kJ

Thus 0.8747 moles of octane give =

Thus -4819 kJ of heat is released by 100.0 g of octane assuming complete combustion.

when—without warning—something provokes your anger, you may struggle not to succumb to it. since what typically makes you mad is feeling powerless in the face of what seems unfair, your anger is mostly an attempt at a “quick fix” to right the balance. it’s as though you’re raising a fist in protest, proclaiming that you’re not going to capitulate to such injustice.

there are, however, a multitude of problems related to this immediate, push-back reaction of anger. and probably the key one is that almost never does it resolve the issue that gave rise to it. such reactive anger is probably best understood as self-defeating. as david burns, the author of the seminal self- book feeling good, observes: if realistically, acting on your anger is to make any sense, it needs to meet two criteria—which, in almost every case, is frankly impossible. that is, your anger must:

be directed toward a person who has intentionally (and needlessly) behaved in a hurtful way toward you; and

be beneficial or advantageous to you (i.e., assist you in achieving a desired goal).

i think you’ll agree that only rarely can you claim that your anger is both warranted and , whether to yourself or the relationship.

so let me offer you a two-step alternative to abandoning your better judgment and giving in to the temptation of anger—one that should neutralize your anger in seconds. or, when you’re really angry, in minutes.

but keep in mind that you must really want to execute these steps, be sufficiently motivated to perform them. which means overcoming more unconscious resistance than you might ever have imagined. because there are many immediate “advantages” of anger that can interfere with your resolve, i’ll suggest a few of them that might interfere with your employing this powerful method to rid yourself of counter-productive anger.

explanation:

it's all four options.