Scientists have a theory about the shape of the earth's surface that is accepted worldwide. a group of scientists have proposed a new theory about the shape of earth's surface. in your own words, explain the impact of the proposed theory on science.

Scientists will tell you that viewpiont which suits their own materialistic perceptions .. They will never suggest for example that the universe originated by collective thought. Scientists belong to a kind of cult which demands that they must convert all subjective perceptions into objective ones which everyone agrees on. In other words their task is to get everyone to agree with the form and functions of the physical universe. It is a materialist philosophy.

Hello!

If you are talking about the idea about people who think the world is flat then I can help

So evidently there is this huge debate on whether or not the world is flat, or if it is round. Now for people who think the world is round: you are correct. If you are people who think that the world is flat then let me say this: By saying the world is flat you are proposing that thousands of space agencies are potentially lying to billions of people. So is 99% of the world right or are you/ the 1%, are right.

I hope it helps!

answer: the primary difference between a hypothesis and a theory is that b hypothesis is falsifiable, but a theory has been proven to be correct. theory is an explanation of something that is happening but hypothesis is a guess of something that can happen

explanation: