What is perfect price discrimination? a. charging consumers different prices across time. b. charging consumers who are less price sensitive a lower price and consumers who are more price sensitive a higher price. c. charging consumers whose demand is less elastic a higher price and consumers whose demand is more elastic a lower price. d. charging every consumer a different price equal to their willingness to pay. e. charging consumers a price equal to consumer surplus. perfect price discrimination is a. unlikely to occur because firms are typically able to keep consumers who buy a product at a low price from reselling it. b. unlikely to occur because firms typically do not know how much each consumer is willing to pay. c. likely to occur because it results in economic efficiency. d. likely to occur because it results in higher profits. e. both a and b. is perfect price discrimination economically efficient? perfect price discrimination is a. inefficient because it converts into producer surplus a portion of consumer surplus. b. inefficient because it results in no consumer surplus. c. efficient because it converts into producer surplus what had been consumer surplus and deadweight loss. d. inefficient because it restricts output below the equilibrium level and creates deadweight loss. e. efficient because it converts into producer and consumer surplus what had been deadweight loss?

Social computing forces companies to deal with customers as opposed to

Jallouk corporation has two different bonds currently outstanding. bond m has a face value of $50,000 and matures in 20 years. the bond makes no payments for the first six years, then pays $2,100 every six months over the subsequent eight years, and finally pays $2,400 every six months over the last six years. bond n also has a face value of $50,000 and a maturity of 20 years; it makes no coupon payments over the life of the bond. the required return on both these bonds is 10 percent compounded semiannually. what is the current price of bond m and bond n?

This problem has been solved! see the answercompute and interpret altman's z-scoresfollowing is selected financial information for ebay, for its fiscal years 2005 and 2006.(in millions, except per share data) 2006 2005current assets $ 4,970.59 $ 3,183.24current liabilities 2,518.39 1,484.93total assets 13,494.01 11,788.99total liabilities 2,589.38 1,741.00shares outstanding 1,368.51 1,404.18retained earnings 4,538.35 2,819.64stock price per share 30.07 43.22sales 5,969.74 4,552.40earnings before interest and taxes 1,439.77 1,445.18compute and interpret altman z-scores for the company for both years. (do not round until your final answer; then round your answers to two decimal places.)2006 z-score = answer2005 z-score = answerwhich of the following best describes the company's likelihood to go bankrupt given the z-score in 2006 compared to 2007.the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. both z-scores are well above the score that represents a healthy company. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly increased the risk of bankruptcy. the z-score in 2006 is half of the 2005 score. the z-score has decreased sharply, which suggests the company is in financial distress. the z-score in 2006 is double the 2005 score. the z-score has increased sharply, which suggests the company has greatly lowered the risk of bankruptcy.