subject
Business, 07.07.2019 06:40 mia3128

Explain how wallace uses one of the three rhetorical appeals to support the claim that alabama has the right to continue policies of racial segregation.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 05:40, Jenan25
Grant, inc., acquired 30% of south co.’s voting stock for $200,000 on january 2, year 1, and did not elect the fair value option. the price equaled the carrying amount and the fair value of the interest purchased in south’s net assets. grant’s 30% interest in south gave grant the ability to exercise significant influence over south’s operating and financial policies. during year 1, south earned $80,000 and paid dividends of $50,000. south reported earnings of $100,000 for the 6 months ended june 30, year 2, and $200,000 for the year ended december 31, year 2. on july 1, year 2, grant sold half of its stock in south for $150,000 cash. south paid dividends of $60,000 on october 1, year 2. before income taxes, what amount should grant include in its year 1 income statement as a result of the investment?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 09:40, MileenaKitana
Wilson center is a private not-for-profit voluntary health and welfare entity. during 2017, it received unrestricted pledges of $638,000, 65 percent of which were payable in 2017, with the remainder payable in 2018 (for use in 2018). officials estimate that 14 percent of all pledges will be uncollectible. a. how much should wilson center report as contribution revenue for 2017? b. in addition, a local social worker, earning $20 per hour working for the state government, contributed 600 hours of time to wilson center at no charge. without these donated services, the organization would have hired an additional staff person. how should wilson center record the contributed service?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 09:50, steph76812
Why should managers invest any excess cash
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 18:00, judali
David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Explain how wallace uses one of the three rhetorical appeals to support the claim that alabama has t...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
History, 31.03.2021 01:00