Obtain an understanding of the business purpose of the transaction. 2. Review the extent and nature of business transacted with major customers, suppliers, borrowers, and lenders. 3. Request personal financial statements from each member of the board of directors. 4. Confirm the transaction amount and terms, including guarantees and other significant data, with the other parties. 5. Discuss significant information with intermediaries, such as banks or attorneys. 6. Consider whether unrecognized transactions are occurring, such as a major shareholder absorbing entity expenses. 7. Inspect and obtain satisfaction concerning the transferability and value of collateral. 8. Test for reasonableness the compilation of amounts to be disclosed or considered for disclosure. 9. Review accounting records for unusual or nonrecurring transactions, especially those occurring near the end of the period. 10. Request written representations from the largest suppliers.

Which of the following statements is correct? large corporations are taxed more favorably than sole proprietorships. corporate stockholders are exposed to unlimited liability. due to limited liability, unlimited lives, and ease of ownership transfer, the vast majority of u. s. businesses (in terms of number of businesses) are organized as corporations. most businesses (by number and total dollar sales) are organized as partnerships or proprietorships because it is easier to set up and operate in one of these forms rather than as a corporation. however, if the business gets very large, it becomes advantageous to convert to a corporation, mainly because corporations have important tax advantages over proprietorships and partnerships. most business (measured by dollar sales) is conducted by corporations in spite of large corporations’ often less favorable tax treatment, due to legal considerations related to ownership transfers and limited liability.

Uknow what i love about i ask a dumb question it is immediately answered but when i ask a real question it take like an hour to get answered

David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?