A utility company constructed a building costing approximately $2 million that encroached on a rancher's property. The rancher is suing the company in federal district court to force the company to remove the office building. In the same action, the rancher is asking for $200,000 in damages incurred because of the trespass. The court has diversity of citizenship jurisdiction. Is the company entitled to a jury trial?
A. Yes, for all issues.
B. Yes, but only for issues involving the trespass action.
C. Yes, but only for issues involving the action to require the company to move its building.
D. No, because the equitable issue predominates.

Suppose the marginal damage and marginal benefit curves in a polluted neighborhood are md = p/3 and mb = 4 – p. also, suppose that transactions costs are low, so that the consumers and the firm can bargain. we saw that in this case, the socially-optimal level of pollution is achieved. start by computing the socially-optimal p. then, for each of the following cases, compute the amount of money transferred through the bargaining process, and indicate who pays whom (i. e., whether consumers pay the firm, or vice versa). also, compute the gains to each party relative to the status quo (i. e., the starting point of the bargaining process).a)consumers have the right to clean air; firm is dominant in the bargaining process. b)consumers have the right to clean air; consumers are dominant in the bargaining process. c)firm has the right to pollute; firm is dominant in the bargaining process. d)firm has the right to pollute; consumers are dominant in the bargaining proces