The state government offered Mike $300,000 for his family’s property, which they plan to use for building a new development.
The
allows the state government to take the property as long as it is used
. Mike can still dispute the government’s offer if the compensation
.
Answers: 3
Business, 22.06.2019 01:00, biggs113056
Awidower devised his fee simple interest in his residence as follows: “to my daughter for life, then to my oldest grandchild who survives her.” at the time of the widower’s death, he was survived by his only two children, a son and a daughter, and by one grandchild, his daughter’s son. a short time later, the daughter together with her son entered into a contract to sell the residence in fee simple to a buyer. the applicable jurisdiction continues to follow the common law rule against perpetuities, but has abrogated the rule in shelley’s case. at the closing, the buyer refused to purchase the residence. can the sellers compel the buyer to do so?
Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 20:20, isabelperez063
Why is it easier for new entrants to get involved in radical innovations when compared to incumbent firms? a. unlike incumbent firms, new entrants do not have to face the high entry barriers, initially. b. new entrants are embedded in an innovation ecosystem, while incumbent firms are not. c. unlike incumbent firms, new entrants do not have formal organizational structures and processes. d. incumbent firms do not have the advantages of network effects that new entrants have.
Answers: 2
The state government offered Mike $300,000 for his family’s property, which they plan to use for bui...
Geography, 10.10.2019 19:00
Biology, 10.10.2019 19:00
Mathematics, 10.10.2019 19:00
Mathematics, 10.10.2019 19:00
Spanish, 10.10.2019 19:00
Biology, 10.10.2019 19:00