Business, 13.07.2021 16:40 lizethdominguez037

A State A consumer was in a traffic accident with a State B driver. The State A consumer's car burst into flames, causing horrific injuries to the consumer. The State A consumer believes that his injuries were caused by both the State B driver's negligence and design defects in his own car. The State A consumer thus properly filed a tort action for damages against both the State B driver and the manufacturer of the car in federal court. The manufacturer is also a citizen of State B. The State B driver was also burned in the accident and believes that manufacturing and design defects in the State A consumer's car also caused his burns. Can the State B driver assert his tort claim against the State B manufacturer in the pending action asserted by the State A consumer

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Business

Business, 21.06.2019 18:20, nicollexo21

Alyeska services company, a division of a major oil company, provides various services to the operators of the north slope oil field in alaska. data concerning the most recent year appear below: sales $18,000,000 net operating income $6,300,000 average operating assets $35,200,000 1. compute the margin for alyeska services company. (round your answer to 2 decimal places.) 2. compute the turnover for alyeska services company. (round your answer to 2 decimal places.) 3. compute the return on investment (roi) for alyeska services company. (round your intermediate calculations and final answer to 2 decimal places.)

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 08:50, sandram74691

Dyed-denim corporation is seeking to lower the costs of value creation and achieve a low-cost position. as a result, it plans to move its manufacturing plant from the u. s. to thailand, which based on company research, is the optimal location for production. this strategic move will most likely allow the company to realize

Answers: 3

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 16:40, krystalsozaa

Determining effects of stock splits oracle corp has had the following stock splits since its inception. effective date split amount october 12, 2000 2 for 1 january 18, 2000 2 for 1 february 26, 1999 3 for 2 august 15, 1997 3 for 2 april 16, 1996 3 for 2 february 22, 1995 3 for 2 november 8, 1993 2 for 1 june 16,1989 2 for 1 december 21, 1987 2 for 1 march 9, 1987 2 for 1 a. if the par value of oracle shares was originally $2, what would oracle corp. report as par value per share on its 2015 balance sheet? compute the revised par value after each stock split. round answers to three decimal places.

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 18:00, flowergirly34

Martha entered into a contract with terry, an art dealer. according to the contract, terry was to supply 18 th century artifacts to martha for the play she was directing, and martha was ready to pay $50,000 for this. another director needed the same artifacts and was ready to pay $60,000. terry decided not to sell the artifacts to martha. in this case, the court may order terry to:

Answers: 2

continue

You know the right answer?

A State A consumer was in a traffic accident with a State B driver. The State A consumer's car burst...