Imagine you are experiencing a major conflict in your place of work. The team with which you are working at the time has split into two factions and simply cannot see eye to eye. Each side feels like the other is not listening and does not value the other's perspective. A mediator has been asked to step in and help with the problem. Of the five strategies for conflict resolution discussed in the lesson, which strategy or strategies do you think the mediator should use? Why? If you think a combination of two or more strategies would work best, explain which should be used and why you think both of them would work better than just one.

Compromising and collaborating are the strategies that should be used.

Explanation:

Collaboration can be understood as the procedure of two and more individuals entities, or organisations cooperating to complete a task or achieve an objective.  

Cooperation and collaboration are two terms that are often used interchangeably. Most collaborations necessitate leadership, albeit it might take the character of social governance within a decentralized and democratic organisation.

To compromise would be to reach an agreement between two or more parties in which each party relinquishes a portion of its claim. Compromise is the idea of reaching an arrangement through negotiation in a disagreement.

answer; /// i do believe that the correct answer is ; ///claude garamond;