The race to the bottom scenario of global environmental degradation is explained roughly like this: a. Companies seek to reduce their costs of operations on plant and equipment design and this results in higher levels of pollution. b. Companies seek the lowest market prices on products in order to gain market share, resulting in inferior goods and increased waste and pollution. c. Profit-seeking multinational companies shift their production from countries with strong environmental standards to countries with weak standards, thus reducing their costs and increasing their profits. d. Companies seek to influence environmental legislation standards are set to the lowest possible standards in the USA in order to maximize profits.

The answer is "Option c".

Explanation:

When there is racing to a bottom scenario, this should be stated that the multinationals looking for profit are shifting production from such countries with strict environmental regulations to minimize the order, thus generating revenue, that's why the profit-based corporations relocate their manufacturing from strong environmental regulations to low standard countries and thereby lower their costs and increase profits.

c

explanation:

well obviously you must be dumb if you dont noe dat

you will have $2593.74 in 10 years if you set aside $1,000 at 10%

you will have $9321.91 in 20 years if you set aside $2000 at 8%

you will have $1469.32 in 5 years if you set aside $1000 at 8%

you will have $1296.87 in 10 years if you set aside $500 at 10%

you will have $239.66 in 15 years if you set aside $100 at 6%

you will have $4660.96 in 20 years if you set aside $1000 at 8%