The Happy Days Day Care is hiring a child care worker. On the employment application, Happy Days specifically asks if the applicant has ever been arrested. Tina applies for a job at Happy Days and answers no to that question. She also answers no to the question that asks if there is any reason that she would not be qualified to work with children. Soon after Tina is hired, she severely shakes a baby to stop it from crying, causing the baby injuries. It is discovered at trial that Tina has been fired from numerous day cares for baby shaking and various other offenses. If the baby's parents sue Happy Days: A) Happy Days is not liable because it made a good faith effort to screen applicants and because it specifically asked about past indiscretions.
B) Happy Days is liable because Tina was dealing not with the public but only with children.
C) Happy Days is liable for negligent hiring.
D) Happy Days is liable for negligent retention.

The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for erismus, inc. erismus’s fiscal year ends on december 31. financial statements are issued in march 2019. erismus prepares its financial statements according to u. s. gaap. required: indicate the amount erismus would record as an asset, liability, or not accrued in the following circumstances. 1. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 2. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,000,000 to $4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. 3. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages will eventually be $5,000,000, with a present value of $3,500,000. 4. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 5. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus’s management believes it is virtually certain that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $500,000.

The relationship requirement for qualifying relative requires the potential qualifying relative to have a family relationship with the taxpayer. t or fwhich of the following is not a from agi deduction? a. standard deductionb. itemized deductionc. personal exemptiond. none of these. all of these are from agi deductions

Acompany sells garden hoses and uses the perpetual inventory system to account for its merchandise. the beginning balance of the inventory and its transactions during september were as follows: