Carlos Espinosa wanted to begin an exercise program and decided to enroll in a local aerobics class. He was told that he would need proper aerobic work-out shoes. Carlos went to an athletic shoe store and explained his needs to the salesclerk and also added that since he had never done aerobics, he was unsure what type of shoe he would need. The salesclerk recommended a shoe that Carlos purchased. When Carlos arrived at aerobics class, his instructor said his shoes were not appropriate for aerobics and that Carlos might injure himself if he used them for the workout. When Carlos returned to the store with the shoes, the store refused to exchange them, citing the three-day limitation on returns. The shoe store: a. has breached the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and is required to either refund Carlos's money or allow him to exchange the shoes.
b. has not breached any warranty since Carlos had no written contract guaranteeing the shoes were appropriate for aerobics.
c. is within its rights to refuse to take the shoes back.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?

Ineed this asap miguel's boss asks him to distribute information to the entire staff about a mandatory meeting. in 1–2 sentences, describe what miguel should do.

Slimwood corporation made sales of $ 725 million during 2018. of this amount, slimwood collected cash for $ 670 million. the company's cost of goods sold was $ 300 million, and all other expenses for the year totaled $ 400 million. also during 2018, slimwood paid $ 420 million for its inventory and $ 285 million for everything else. beginning cash was $ 110 million. carter's top management is interviewing you for a job and they ask two questions: (a) how much was carter's net income for 2018? (b) how much was carter's cash balance at the end of 2016? you will get the job only if you answer both questions correctly.