In a case where a man sues a corporation for unsafe business practices, he will have to meet what burden of proof? a. under the laws of man b. a preponderance of evidence c. technical reasonability d. beyond a reasonable doubt

The answer is "b. A preponderance of evidence".

The preponderance of the evidence is a standard of proof, or standard of verification, utilized in common preliminaries. Common preliminaries are cases which include questions that are not criminal in nature.  

The idea of "preponderance of the evidence" can be envisioned as a scale speaking to the weight of verification, with the totality of proof exhibited by each side laying on the individual plate on either side of the scale. In the event that the scale tips marginally to the other side or the other, the weightier side will win. On the off chance that the scale does not tip toward the side of the gathering bearing the weight of evidence, that party can't win.

answer; ///i believe the correct answer is (c) laissez-faire;

the investment was $14,174.196

explanation:

a lump sum means that the father of the example made one deposit and leave it be.

we need to know the value of a capital that generated at 4.05% per year during 28 years the sum of $48,613.24

now clearing the formula to solve for capital we got:

and we reach the answer investment = $14,174.20