Kenmart Realty sued to evict Mr. and Ms. Armondo from a residential apartment for nonpayment of rent and sought the unpaid monies, totaling several thousand dollars. In defense, the Armondos claimed that their apartment had toxic mold. They testified that there were large patches of dark mold in the walls and floor of the living room, bedroom, and kitchen, that there was a foul odor from the mold and that they had begun to suffer frequent headaches. They testified that the landlord had refused numerous requests to remove the mold. Please rule on the landlord’s suit, assuming that they reside in a jurisdiction with the implied warranty of habitability. a. The landlord will win because the Armondos did not vacate the property.

b. The landlord will lose because the conditions violate the warranty of habitability.

c. Whether or not the landlord wins depends on whether or not there was a warranty of habitability in the lease.

d. None of the above.

Dozier company produced and sold 1,000 units during its first month of operations. it reported the following costs and expenses for the month: direct materials $ 69,000 direct labor $ 35,000 variable manufacturing overhead $ 15,000 fixed manufacturing overhead 28,000 total manufacturing overhead $ 43,000 variable selling expense $ 12,000 fixed selling expense 18,000 total selling expense $ 30,000 variable administrative expense $ 4,000 fixed administrative expense 25,000 total administrative expense $ 29,000 required: 1. with respect to cost classifications for preparing financial statements: a. what is the total product cost

Anthony wants to start making periodic investments in aretirement account. he will make a yearly contribution of$3,000 at the beginning of each year. the account will pay7.2% interest, compounded monthly. how much will hisaccount be worth after 35 years? $369,600$10,560$112,560$490,928.71

Astudent was asked to draw a demand and supply graph to illustrate the effect on the market for premium bottled water of a fall in the price of electrolyteselectrolytes used in some brands of premium bottled​ water, holding everything else constant. she drew the graph to the right and explained it as​ follows: ​"electrolyteselectrolytes are an input to some brands of premium bottled​ water, so a fall in the price of electrolyteselectrolytes will cause the supply curve for premium bottled water to shift to the right​ (from upper s 1s1 to upper s 2 right parenthesis .s2). because this shift in the supply curve results in a lower price left parenthesis upper p 2 right parenthesis commap2, consumers will want to buy more premium bottled water and the demand curve will shift to the right​ (from upper d 1d1 to upper d 2 right parenthesis .d2). we know that more premium bottled water will be​ sold, but we​ can't be sure whether the price of premium bottled water will rise or fall. that depends on whether the supply curve or the demand curve has shifted farther to the right. i assume that the effect on supply is greater than the effect on​ demand, so i show the final equilibrium price left parenthesis upper p 3 right parenthesisp3 as being lower than the initial equilibrium price left parenthesis upper p 1 right parenthesis .p1.​" where is the flaw in the​ student's argument? supply will shift inward. demand will not shift. demand will shift inward.