The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) provides that if a sales contract is found to be unconscionable, a court can refuse to enforce that contract, but the UCC does not define unconscionability or provide any guidelines for courts to use in determining if a contract is unconscionable. This lack of guidance for courts has led courts to sometimes rule that contracts are not enforceable if a contract is too unfair or if a contract is so outrageous or immoral that it shocks the sensibilities of the court. Should there be more guidance given by the UCC to courts in determining unconscionability? What kind of guidance should be given? Can you think of a contract that would be unconscionable?
​

Nellie lumpkin, who suffered from dementia, was admitted to the picayune convalescent center, a nursing home. because of her mental condition, her daughter, beverly mcdaniel, signed the admissions agreement. it included a clause requiring the par- ties to submit any dispute to arbitration. after lumpkin left the center two years later, she filed a suit against picayune to recover damages for mistreatment and malpractice. [covenant health & rehabilitation of picayune, lp v. lumpkin, 23 so.2d 1092 (miss. app. 2009)] (see page 91.) 1. is it ethical for this dispute—involving negligent medical care, not a breach of a commercial contract—to be forced into arbitration? why or why not? discuss whether medical facilities should be able to impose arbitration when there is generally no bargaining over such terms.

Alicia has a collision deductible of $500 and a bodily injury liability coverage limit of $50,000. she hits another driver and injures them severely. the case goes to trial and there is a verdict to compensate the injured person for $40,000 how much does she pay?

How does the plaintiff, mrs. wood, try to implicate the gun manufacturer ( who testifies, what do they say, what evidence is introduced)?