You have decided to throw a party next weekend for 19 friends. The friends are going to bring health food, so all you have to have available are the drinks. You estimate that, on average, each person will drink four bottles of soft drinks. Three of your friends will drink only natural soda without unneeded color - so Sulo Ginger Ale should work well for them. For the others and yourself, you decide to buy Sulo Cola. Before going online, you check the refrigerator - you already have six bottles of Sulo Ginger Ale and 14 of Sulo Cola. Since this is the end of the semester - you decide that you don't really want any of the soft drinks on hand after the party. Now, you are ordering on the Internet. A. How many bottles of Sulo Ginger Ale do you plan to buy?
B. How many bottles of Sulo Cola do you plan to buy?

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.