giving 80 points. Imagine that you are an economist whose job is to judge the impact of a new robotic assembly machine that is being widely adopted throughout the automotive industry. This new machinery has greatly increased the rate of new car production. However, it has also replaced many workers, leading to widespread job losses. In addition, although the supply of new cars may soon exceed demand, prices and profits have remained stable so far. In a brief paragraph, explain whether you would judge that this new technology has helped or hurt the overall economy. Be sure to clarify why you decided as you did. giving 80 points.

Reliability and validity reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. in the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways. unfortunately, being consistent in measurement does not necessarily mean that you have measured something correctly. to illustrate this concept, consider a kitchen scale that would be used to measure the weight of cereal that you eat in the morning. if the scale is not properly calibrated, it may consistently under- or overestimate the amount of cereal that’s being measured. while the scale is highly reliable in producing consistent results (e. g., the same amount of cereal poured onto the scale produces the same reading each time), those results are incorrect. this is where validity comes into play. validity refers to the extent to which a given instrument or tool accurately measures what it’s supposed to measure. while any valid measure is by necessity reliable, the reverse is not necessarily true. researchers strive to use instruments that are both highly reliable and valid.