Koby, age 16, works after school at FastFood from 4 p. m. until 11 p. m. On Friday night, therestaurant manager sees that Koby is exhausted, but insists that he remain until 4:30 a. m.,cleaning up, then demands that he work Saturday morning from 8 a. m. until 4 p. m. On Saturdayafternoon, as Koby drives home, he falls asleep at the wheel and causes a fatal car accident. Should FastFood be liable? What important values are involved in this issue? How does theGolden Rule apply?

find answer in the explanation below

Explanation:

Koby is 16 and that means he is under age for a start. That initial statement makes Fastfood liable.

As it can be seen from the question, the golden rule applies to Koby's case as it is clear he has other things to do with his time.

Primarily, he is a student and that means he has school work to do alongside putting in some hours at Fastfood. But then, he still has the right to be treated right which in this case means him getting some rest. It is therefore safe to say that the manager of Fastfood is trying to take advantage of Koby and should have given him rest.

if he had gotten some rest, he wouldn't have fallen asleep while driving and been in the accident.

Cheers

its high unemployment figures

i just had a test with that question

rational decision making is a multi-step process for making choices between alternatives. the process of rational decision making favors logic, objectivity, and analysis over subjectivity and insight. the word “rational” in this context does not mean sane or clear-headed as it does in the colloquial sense.

hope this