Caveat emptor as a legal principle continues to be recognized because . Sellers don’t want to be bothered with quality. The courts place some level of responsibility on consumers to make certain they know what they are buying and its general quality; otherwise, courts would be forever resolving small disputes. Common law is less expensive to enforce than more contemporary laws. Caveat emptor is no longer a recognized legal principle.

sellers don't want to be bothered with quality

Explanation:

hope this helps

The courts place some level of responsibility on consumers to make certain they know what they are buying and its general quality; otherwise, courts would be forever resolving small disputes.

Explanation:

This principle is based on the understanding that buyers have an opportunity to inspect the item, to have it inspected by a qualified professional, and to research its history before making a decision to buy. If the buyer, whether he takes advantage of this opportunity or not, chooses to buy the item, he cannot blame the seller for any deficiencies he may later discover.

explanation: doctrine of respondeat superior is a legal doctrine that is commonly used in tort. this principle makes an employer or principal legally responsible for the wrongful acts done by an employee or agent, if such acts occur within the scope of the employment or agency.

can your question and add a list so i can you out?