Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 19:00, eraines1714
Which of the following is likely not a benefit of requiring a grand jury to listen to and examine all of the evidence against a person suspected of committing a serious crime and then independently deciding whether or not to hand down an indictment? 1.the grand jury system provides the accused another safeguard against being sent to trial and facing conviction based on flawed evidence. 2.the members of the grand jury are drawn from the community and are empowered to render independent decisions about whether or not the government has collected enough evidence to bring an individual to trial. 3.the grand jury’s decision can provide prosecutors insight into what is necessary to build a sufficient case if a similar crime is presented later. 4.the grand jury is impaneled to rubber-stamp prosecutors’ cases, which makes it possible for more cases to reach trial.
Answers: 2
Business, 22.06.2019 20:10, boofpack9775
As the inventor of hypertension medication, onesure pharmaceuticals (osp) inc. was able to reap the benefits of economies of scale due to a large consumer demand for the drug. even when competitors later developed similar drugs after the expiry of osp's patents, regular users did not want to switch because they were concerned about possible side effects. which of the following benefits does this scenario best illustrate? a. first-mover advantages b. social benefits c. network externalities d. fringe benefits
Answers: 3
Money needed to expand for additional inventory, equipment, marketing cost, employees, etc. is known...
History, 29.07.2019 19:00
Mathematics, 29.07.2019 19:00
Social Studies, 29.07.2019 19:00
Biology, 29.07.2019 19:00
Social Studies, 29.07.2019 19:00