Adam, Ben and Erica are liquidating their partnership. Before selling the assets and paying the liabilities, the capital balances are Adam $41,000, Ben $31,000 and Erica $20,000. The profit and loss sharing ratio has been 1:1:2 for Adam, Ben and Erica, respectively. The partnership has $72,000 cash, $40,000 non-cash assets, and $20,000 accounts payable. Requirement 1. Assuming the partnership sells the non-cash assets for $50,000, how much cash will each partner receive in final liquidation? Requirement 2. Assuming the partnership sells the non-cash assets for $25,000, how much cash will each partner receive in final liquidation?

Which of the following businesses is most likely to disrupt an existing industry? a. closer connex developed an earphone that receives emails and text messages and converts them to voice messages. the first models had poor reception, but they rapidly improved over time. b. mega technologies reconfigured the components used in its touchscreen tablets to create a new type of wearable device for use in restaurants and other service industries. c. particle inc. developed a teleportation technology that can transport physical materials instantaneously across great distances. d. altrea added advanced camera technology to its premium line of smartphones so that they would take the highest-quality photos of all phones on the market.

Why is the cournot equilibrium an​ equilibrium? a. there are​ short-run barriers to exit in a cournot​ duopoly, so both firms cannot alter their output levels. b. given the other​ firm's level of​ production, both firms are maximizing profits and cannot improve their situation by unilaterally altering their level of output. c. both firms operate at zero profit under a cournot​ equilibrium, so they would face negative profits if they change output. d. both firms operate at minimum​ long-run average cost under a cournot​ equilibrium, so changes to output would reduce​ long-run profits. even if they​ can't collude, why​ don't firms set their outputs at the joint​ profit-maximizing levels​ (i. e., the levels they would have chosen had they​ colluded)? a. given that other firm produces at the collusive​ level, a firm could increase their own profits by increasing output above the collusive level. b. the midpoint of the collusion curve​ (i. e., the collusive​ outcome) lies below the reaction​ curves, so both firms have an incentive to increase output under the cournot duopoly. c. both a and b are correct d. both a and b are incorrect

Suppose that a recent celebrity endorsement made more people prefer this brand of cell phone. now, more cell phones are demanded at each price level. the new equilibrium price is where both supply and demand quantities equal $120, 200 or $160, 300