Business, 19.08.2020 05:01 cxttiemsp021

Two mutually exclusive alternatives are under consideration, with the same initial investment of $300,000. The difference between the alternatives is in the revenue. Alternative A will earn a fixed revenue of $60,000 per year. The revenue for Alternative B starts slowly at an estimated $10,000 in the first year, with a growth of $15,000 per year. The MARR is 896 per year, and the maximum projection period is 10 years for either alternative. Use: (a) payback analysis to select the more economical alternative. Ans: Select based on payback analysis
(b) present worth analysis (for n=10 years) to select the more economical alternative. Ans: Select based on Present Worth analysis
(c) Is there any difference in selection between the two analysis?Ans:

Answers: 1

Show answers

Other questions on the subject: Business

Business, 22.06.2019 15:40, kaitlynmorgan43

The cost of direct labor used in production is recorded as a? a. credit to work-in-process inventory account. b. credit to wages payable. c. credit to manufacturing overhead account. d. credit to wages expense.

Answers: 2

continue

Business, 22.06.2019 21:40, Abdul111

Penny poodle wanted to know which dog obedience training program was more effective: puppy pride, the approach she has been using for any years, or doggie do-right, a new approach. penny convinced 50 human companions of untrained dogs to participate in her study. the dogs and their humans were randomly assigned to complete the puppy pride or doggie do-right course. at the end of the training programs, all of the dogs were scored on their level of obedience on a standardized dog obedience checklist (scores could range from 10 to 100). the design of this study is:

Answers: 2

continue

Business, 23.06.2019 08:30, gabe7774

1. using only the amounts given, compute net cash provided by operations, both without and with the reclassification of the receivables. which reporting makes moss look better? 2. under what condition would the reclassification of the receivables be ethical? 3. unethical?

Answers: 1

continue

Business, 23.06.2019 12:40, BlehBlehBlehBleh

Intoxicated and not aware of the consequences, umberto agrees to a two-year cell-phone service contract with wander talk, inc., at more than the average market price. this contract is not enforceable because the contract clearly favors wander talk. not enforceable because umberto was intoxicated enough to lack mental capacity when he agreed to it. not enforceable because contracting parties can change their minds. enforceable.

Answers: 3

continue

You know the right answer?

Two mutually exclusive alternatives are under consideration, with the same initial investment of $30...