Alexander has been accepted as a freshman at a college two hundred miles from his home for the fall semester. Alexander's wealthy uncle, Michael, decides to give Alexander a car for Christmas. In November, Michael makes a contract with Jackson Auto Sales to purchase a new car for $18,000 to be delivered to Alexander just before the Christmas holidays, in mid-December. The title to the car is to be in Alexander's name. Michael pays the full purchase price, calls Alexander and tells him about the gift, and takes off for a six-month vacation in Europe. Is Alexander an intended third party beneficiary of the contract between Michael and Jackson Auto Sales

Yes.  

Alexander is an intended third party beneficiary of the contract between Michael and Jackson Auto Sales.

Explanation:

In the law of contracts, Alexander becomes a third-party beneficiary of the contract between Michael and Jackson Auto Sales, and he has the right to sue in the contract notwithstanding that he was not an active party to the contract.  Some of the factors that may be present to show that a Alexander is an intended beneficiary are: (1) the contract's performance is rendered directly to Alexander; (2) Alexander has rights to control the details of the performance; or (3) there is an express designation in the contract, e.g. the title to the car is in Alexander's name.

i would prefer to go with the news article for nate, its recent and updated and stores a lot of information

answer; ///blank(1) 75%; blank(2) 40%;