3. Which of the following would be an ethical concern for a business's future? O An American company sends funds to help victims of wildfires in Australia.
O A global company pays young adults from an underdeveloped country $2.00 per hour to create their products.
An international company creates a policy that affects employees company-wide.
O An American company knowingly hires illegal immigrants to work for $5.00 an hour to create their product

The chart shows the pricing history for two items. which person saved the most money by buying a product at the right time? carrie, who waited six months to buy a game system timothy, who bought a game system right away because it was popular eugene, who bought a phone immediately for fear they would sell out marlene, who waited six months to buy a phone

Employees at a library check out books to patrons. books have an isbn and a name. the library sometimes has multiple copies of the same book. books have one or more authors. a patron is an individual who has an active (non-expired) library card. for each library card, we store the person's first and last names and their address. for each employee, we store their employee id, current salary, first and last name and their address. we also store the employee id of their current manager. each time we check out a book to a patron we need to store the date of the transaction, the employee who checked out the book to the patron, and the library card of the patron. some employees have library cards. if an employee patron turns in a book late, the fine that they pay is a percentage of their salary. some employees are authors who have library cards—they are allowed to check out as many books as they like.

David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?