Acme Corporation uses the calendar year as their fiscal year for reporting purposes. Acme Corporation is owned 100% by Jesse Smith. Jesse Smith is quite wealthy - he has over $3 million in a personal savings account which is currently earning 2 one hundredths of 1% interest (or .0002 rate resulting in $600 per year). He also has many other investments. Acme Corporation has $300,000 of current assets. Acme has Accounts Payable of $40,000 and various Payroll liabilities totaling $109,000. Acme also has a Note Payable in the amount of $800,000. There are no other liabilities. Interest has been paid every year when due on December 31. The Note Payable is due in $200,000 installments on June 30 of each year for the next 4 years. The current interest rate on the note is 4%. However, according to the loan terms, if Acme's current ratio falls below 2, the interest rate will automatically increase to 7%. Since the note is due in installments over the next 4 years, management is presenting the Note on the balance sheet as a long term liability. 1. Is Acme's management reporting their balance sheet appropriately?
2. What recommendations do you have for management?
3. How do these recommendations impact the current ratio?

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.