subject
Business, 25.07.2020 04:01 katherineweightman

During 2025, Saul Company discovered that the ending inventories reported on its financial statements were incorrect by the following amounts: 2023 $60,000 understated 2024 $75,000 understated Prior to any adjustments for these errors and ignoring income taxes, 2024 Net Income would be:

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 05:30, junior2461
Identify the three components of a family's culture and provide one example from your own experience
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 10:50, jadeafrias
You are evaluating two different silicon wafer milling machines. the techron i costs $285,000, has a three-year life, and has pretax operating costs of $78,000 per year. the techron ii costs $495,000, has a five-year life, and has pretax operating costs of $45,000 per year. for both milling machines, use straight-line depreciation to zero over the project’s life and assume a salvage value of $55,000. if your tax rate is 24 percent and your discount rate is 11 percent, compute the eac for both machines.
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 16:30, bedsaul12345
Which of the following has the largest impact on opportunity cost
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 17:00, adrianbanuelos1999
Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court. the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located. because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center. because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
During 2025, Saul Company discovered that the ending inventories reported on its financial statement...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Engineering, 16.10.2020 07:01
Konu
Mathematics, 16.10.2020 07:01