subject
Business, 15.07.2020 17:01 completed7

A manufacturer of breakfast cereals has the opportunity to purchase barley at $3.00 a bushel for 10,000 bushels, if it also buys 5,000 bushels of wheat at $16.00 per bushel. However, the manufacturer does not use any barley in its products, and currently needs 20,000 bushels of wheat. If the current market price of barley is $3.80 per bushel and that of wheat is $15.80 per bushel, should this opportunity be taken, and why? A. Because the value of the opportunity is positive, the opportunity should be taken. B. Because the company has no need of barley, the opportunity should not be taken. C. Because the opportunity does not meet the company's need for wheat, the opportunity should not be taken. D. Because the value of the opportunity is negative, the opportunity should not be taken.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 09:00, nicoleaaliyah
Brian has been working for a few years now and has saved a substantial amount of money. he now wants to invest 50 percent of his savings in a bank account where it will be locked for three years and gain interest. which type of bank account should brian open? a. savings account b. money market account c. checking account d. certificate of deposit
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 15:40, Fire8615
Colter steel has $5,550,000 in assets. temporary current assets $ 3,100,000 permanent current assets 1,605,000 fixed assets 845,000 total assets $ 5,550,000 assume the term structure of interest rates becomes inverted, with short-term rates going to 10 percent and long-term rates 2 percentage points lower than short-term rates. earnings before interest and taxes are $1,170,000. the tax rate is 40 percent earnings after taxes = ?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 18:00, judali
David paid $975,000 for two beachfront lots in coastal south carolina, with the intention of building residential homes on each. two years later, the south carolina legislature passed the beachfront management act, barring any further development of the coast, including david's lots. when david files a complaint to seek compensation for his property, south carolina refuses, pointing to a passage in david's own complaint that states "the beachfront management act [was] properly and validly designed to south carolina's " is south carolina required to compensate david under the takings clause?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00, enriqueliz1680
Beranek corp has $720,000 of assets, and it uses no debt--it is financed only with common equity. the new cfo wants to employ enough debt to raise the debt/assets ratio to 40%, using the proceeds from borrowing to buy back common stock at its book value. how much must the firm borrow to achieve the target debt ratio? a. $273,600b. $288,000c. $302,400d. $317,520e. $333,396
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
A manufacturer of breakfast cereals has the opportunity to purchase barley at $3.00 a bushel for 10,...

Questions in other subjects: