subject
Business, 27.06.2020 20:01 Qpaoswp5914

Common resources versus private goods Spring is here, and Sharon and her grandfather would like to go fishing for the weekend in Florida. Sharon could either go to the river in town where anyone can fish without a permit, or she could drive up to a stream located on her family's property in the countryside to fish. Assume that, no matter where people fish, all of the fish that are caught would be kept (that is, there is no "catch and release" policy).
The fish in the river are considered (nonrival in consumption; rival in consumption) and (excludable; nonexcludable) whereas the fish in the private stream are (nonrival in consumtion; rival in consumption) and (excludable; nonexcludable) . In other words, the fish in the river are an example of (a public good; a private good; a common resource; a club good), and the fish in the private stream are an example of (a public good; a private good; a common resource; a club good).
Fishing in the river will likely lead to (moral hazard; the Tragedy of the Commons; the free-rider problem) because of which of the following reasons?
Nobody will enjoy fishing because of the lack of private contributions to the maintenance of the river.
Anyone can fish in the river, and one person's fishing activity decreases the ability of someone else to fish with success.
All fishermen will choose to fish in the stream believing that there are more fish there.
All fishermen will choose to fish in the river because of the limited access to the stream.

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 22.06.2019 03:30, emmanuelcampbel
Nellie lumpkin, who suffered from dementia, was admitted to the picayune convalescent center, a nursing home. because of her mental condition, her daughter, beverly mcdaniel, signed the admissions agreement. it included a clause requiring the par- ties to submit any dispute to arbitration. after lumpkin left the center two years later, she filed a suit against picayune to recover damages for mistreatment and malpractice. [covenant health & rehabilitation of picayune, lp v. lumpkin, 23 so.2d 1092 (miss. app. 2009)] (see page 91.) 1. is it ethical for this dispute—involving negligent medical care, not a breach of a commercial contract—to be forced into arbitration? why or why not? discuss whether medical facilities should be able to impose arbitration when there is generally no bargaining over such terms.
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 04:40, boomerjm
How long have u been on dis website
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 19:30, buggamarshall85
The owner of firewood to go is considering buying a hydraulic wood splitter which sells for $50,000. he figures it will cost an additional $100 per cord to purchase and split wood with this machine, while he can sell each cord of split wood for $125. if, for this machine, design capacity is 50 cords per day, effective capacity is 40 cords per day, and actual output is expected to be 32 cords per day, what would be its efficiency?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 20:20, jskdkfjf
Fractional reserve banking which of the following statements about fractional reserve banking are correct? check all that apply. fractional reserve banking allows banks to create money through the lending process. fractional reserve banking does not allow banks to hold excess reserves. fractional reserve banking allows banks to create additional wealth by lending some reserves. fractional reserve banking relies on everyone not withdrawing their money at the same time.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Common resources versus private goods Spring is here, and Sharon and her grandfather would like to...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 05.07.2019 09:00