At the first meeting, team members appear to have a difference of opinion regarding the direction of the project. Robin and Khalil want to discuss the general goals of the events. Jordan and Adam believe that it's unnecessary to spend time discussing goals and philosophy and want to go straight to discussing team ground rules and making assignments. You're in the unenviable position of being the tie-breaker. Your vote can take the team in one of two directions: ironing out the general goals or establishing team ground rules and assignments. Which direction will you choose

The correct answer is the second option: to go straight to discussing team ground rules and making assignments.

Explanation:

To begin with, in the case presented the team must understand that the general goals and the philosophy behind their actions and operations at the time of working must been already understood by everyone at that point due to the fact that those things are mentionated before start the action. Therefore that as Jordan and Adam said, it is unnecessary to discuss the things that they already must undersood, if they did their previous homework, and must go straight to the action and gain time instead of lossing it. Moreover, by doing that they will have time enough to even correct mistakes that they make during the process, so that is why to go straight to the action is the correct option to take.  

answer; /// i believe that the correct answer is (b) money set aside for emergency repairs;

the answer is: c.that person might be arrested and deported

filling w-4 form incorrectly usually would rise suspicions from government's auditors. when they notice such mistakes, they would send their teams to investigate the situation further.

if those investigation teams believe that the incorrectness is done on purpose (with malicious intent), that person can be arrested or deported