subject
Business, 05.05.2020 06:57 euniceyi56

On March 1, 2017, Elkhart enters into a new contract to build a specialized warehouse for $7 million. The promise to transfer the warehouse is determined to be a performance obligation. The contract states that if the warehouse is usable by November 30, 2017, Elkhart will receive a bonus of $600,000. For every week after November 30 that the warehouse is not usable, the bonus will decrease by $150,000. Elkhart provides the following completion schedule:
Probability of Completion:
November 30, 2017 60%
December 7, 2017 20%
December 14, 2017 10%
December 21, 2017 5%
December 28, 2017 5%
Required:
1. Assume that Elkhart used the expected value approach. What amount should Elkhart use for the transaction price?
2. Assume that Elkhart used the most likely approach. What amount should Elkhart use for the transaction price?
3. What is the objective of determinng the transaction price based on the amount of variable consideration?

ansver
Answers: 1

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 19:00, yoongnzl
Danielle enjoy working as in certified public accountant (cpa) and assisting small business and individuals with managing their financial and taxes . which general area of accounting is her specialty ?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 05:30, 2023greenlanden
The hartman family is saving $400 monthly for ronald's college education. the family anticipates they will need to contribute $20,000 towards his first year of college, which is in 4 years .which best explain s whether the family will have enough money in 4 years ?
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 08:40, kamarionnatillman13
The following selected circumstances relate to pending lawsuits for erismus, inc. erismus’s fiscal year ends on december 31. financial statements are issued in march 2019. erismus prepares its financial statements according to u. s. gaap. required: indicate the amount erismus would record as an asset, liability, or not accrued in the following circumstances. 1. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes the company has a slightly worse than 50/50 chance of eventually prevailing in court, and that if it loses, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 2. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages could fall anywhere in the range of $2,000,000 to $4,000,000, with any damage in that range equally likely. 3. erismus is defending against a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company will lose in court. if it loses, management believes that damages will eventually be $5,000,000, with a present value of $3,500,000. 4. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus's management believes it is probable that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $1,000,000. 5. erismus is a plaintiff in a lawsuit. erismus’s management believes it is virtually certain that the company eventually will prevail in court, and that if it prevails, the judgment will be $500,000.
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 09:00, flore7488
Your grandmother told you a dollar doesn't go as far as it used to. she says the purchasing power of a dollar is much lesser than it used to be. explain what she means. try and use and explain terms like inflation and deflation in your answer.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
On March 1, 2017, Elkhart enters into a new contract to build a specialized warehouse for $7 million...

Questions in other subjects:

Konu
Mathematics, 26.10.2020 17:00