subject
Business, 06.05.2020 03:15 bensleytristap93y8q

Breakdown of a cartel agreement Consider a town in which only two residents, Jake and Latasha, own wells that produce water safe for drinking. Jake and Latasha can pump and sell as much water as they want at no cost. For them, total revenue equals profit. The following table shows the town's demand schedule for water. Price Quantity Demanded Total Revenue (Dollars per gallon) (Gallons of water) (Dollars) 3.60 0 0 3.30 35 $115.50 3.00 70 $210.00 2.70 105 $283.50 2.40 140 $336.00 2.10 175 $367.50 1.80 210 $378.00 1.50 245 $367.50 1.20 280 $336.00 0.90 315 $283.50 0.60 350 $210.00 0.30 385 $115.50 0 420 0 Suppose Jake and Latasha form a cartel and behave as a monopolist. The profit-maximizing price is per gallon, and the total output is gallons. As part of their cartel agreement, Jake and Latasha agree to split production equally. Therefore, Jake's profit is , and Latasha's profit is . Suppose that Jake and Latasha have been successfully operating as a cartel. They each charge the monopoly price and sell half of the monopoly quantity. Then one night before going to sleep, Jake says to himself, "Latasha and I aren't the best of friends anyway. If I increase my production to 35 gallons more than the cartel amount, I can increase my profit even though her profit goes down. I will do that starting tomorrow." After Jake implements his new plan, the price of waterincreases to per gallon. Given Latasha and Jake's production levels, Jake's profit becomes and Latasha's profit becomes . Because Jake has deviated from the cartel agreement and increased his output of water to 35 gallons more than the cartel amount, Latasha decides that she will also increase her production to 35 gallons more than the cartel amount. After Latasha increases her production, Jake's profit becomes , Latasha's profit becomes , and total profit (the sum of the profits of Jake and Latasha) is now . True or False: Based on the fact that both Jake and Latasha increased production from the initial cartel quantity, you know that the output effect was smaller than the price effect at that quantity. True False Jake and Latasha have each cheated on their cartel agreement and increased production by 35 gallons more than the cartel amount. However, they both realize that if they continue to increase output beyond this amount, they'll each suffer a decrease in profit. (To see this for yourself, consider Jake's profit when he produces 70 gallons more than the cartel amount compared to his profit when he produces 35 gallons more than the cartel amount.) Neither Jake nor Latasha has an incentive to further increase output, nor does either have an incentive to decrease output. This outcome is an example oftying .

ansver
Answers: 2

Other questions on the subject: Business

image
Business, 21.06.2019 18:10, Karumbafaith
Classifying inflows and outflows of cash classify each of the following items as an inflow (i) or an outflow (o) of cash, or as neither (n). lg 2 lg 2 item change ($) item change ($) cash +100 accounts receivable −700 accounts payable −1,000 net profits +600 notes payable +500 depreciation +100 long-term debt −2,000 repurchase of stock +600 inventory +200 cash dividends +800 fixed assets +400 sale of stock +1,000
Answers: 1
image
Business, 22.06.2019 02:00, johnkings140
Alandowner and his neighbor purchased adjoining undeveloped lots. after both built homes on their respective lots, the landowner suggested to the neighbor that a common driveway be built where the two lots joined. the neighbor agreed. the landowner and the neighbor split the cost of constructing the driveway and entered into a written agreement to equally share the costs of its upkeep and maintenance. the agreement was recorded in the county recorder's office. two years later, the neighbor built a new driveway located entirely on his lot. the common driveway, which the landowner continued to use but which the neighbor no longer used, began to deteriorate. the landowner asked the neighbor for money to maintain the common driveway, but the neighbor refused to contribute. three years later, the neighbor conveyed his lot to a friend. the friend entered into possession and used only the driveway built by the neighbor. by this time, the common driveway had deteriorated badly and contained numerous potholes. the landowner asked the friend to pay half of what it would take to repair the common driveway. the friend refused. the landowner repaired the driveway and sued the friend for 50% of the cost of repairs. will the landowner prevail?
Answers: 2
image
Business, 22.06.2019 05:00, jason9394
Identify an organization with the low-total-cost value proposition and suggest at least two possible measures within each of the four balanced scorecard perspectives.
Answers: 3
image
Business, 22.06.2019 06:10, aj0914
Investment x offers to pay you $5,700 per year for 9 years, whereas investment y offers to pay you $8,300 per year for 5 years. if the discount rate is 6 percent, what is the present value of these cash flows? (do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e. g., 32.16.) present value investment x $ investment y $ if the discount rate is 16 percent, what is the present value of these cash flows? (do not round intermediate calculations and round your answers to 2 decimal places, e. g., 32.16.) present value investment x $ investment y
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Breakdown of a cartel agreement Consider a town in which only two residents, Jake and Latasha, own w...

Questions in other subjects: